Montenegro
AMontenegro has reported information on hate crimes to ODIHR, most recently for the 2019 and 2021 Hate Crime Reports. Montenegro implemented ODIHR's Training Against Hate Crimes for Law Enforcement (TAHCLE) programme in 2014 and updated the training in 2022 following changes to the country's hate crime legislation in 2018. In 2022, ODIHR organized a refresher TAHCLE course. In 2023, Montenegro implemented ODIHR's Prosecutors and Hate Crime Training (PAHCT) training. In 2017, Montenegro adopted measures to allow for the effective prosecution of hate crimes following the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Alkovic v. Montenegro (No. 66895/10). In 2023, Montenegro amended legislation to include public acts provoking or inciting racial and religious hatred (Article 370), as well as special circumstances for sentencing hate crimes (Article 42a).
OFFICIAL DATA REPORTED BY STATES
Year | Hate crimes recorded by police | Prosecuted | Sentenced |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 19 | 4 | 623 |
2022 | 3 | Not available | 602 |
2021 | 7 | - | 5 |
2020 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2019 | 31 | - | 3 |
2018 | - | 0 | 1 |
2017 | Not available | Not available | 1 |
2016 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2015 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2014 | Not available | Not available | 0 |
2013 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2012 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2011 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2010 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
2009 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
About 2023 Data
-
Police figures include two cases of hate speech, which fall outside the OSCE's definition of hate crime.
The number of prosecuted cases represent four bills of indictment for the criminal offence under Article 370 (causing national, racial, and religious hatred), which falls outside the OSCE's hate crime definition.
The number of sentenced cases might include cases of hate speech, which fall outside the OSCE's definition of hate crime.
Hate crime recorded by police
The breakdown below excludes two cases of hate speech that fall outside the OSCE's hate crime definition.
KEY OBSERVATION
ODIHR recognizes Montenegro's efforts to build the capacity of prosecutors and judiciary on hate crime, as well as to amend the existing legal framework in order to ensure that bias motivation can be effectively acknowledged. However, based on the available information, ODIHR observes that Montenegro's hate crime recording and statistics do not sufficiently distinguish hate crimes from other crimes. In addition, ODIHR observes that Montenegro would benefit from developing its victim support system to ensure effective access to justice, assistance, and protection services for hate crime victims.
ODIHR recalls that in Ministerial Council Decision 9/09, OSCE participating States committed to collecting reliable data and statistics in sufficient detail on hate crimes, including the bias motivation of hate crimes, and to reporting such data periodically to ODIHR. Participating States also committed to providing hate crime victims with access to counselling, legal assistance, and effective access to justice, as well as to increase a positive interaction between police and victims of hate crimes by training front-line officers, including on referrals to victim assistance and protection.
ODIHR stands ready to support Montenegro in meeting the relevant commitments through its comprehensive resources and tailored assistance in the area of hate crime recording and data collection, as well as through its further resources and assistance on hate crime victim support.