Зарегистрирован на сайте

12 years 5 months
Year
Report data for country
Cases Perpetrators were Sentenced
103
Cases Prosecuted
1371
Cases Recorded by Police
1568
Explanation to the total figures recorded
In addition to hate crimes, the numbers reported here also include other types of "discrimination" incidents, which can fall outside of the OSCE's definition of a hate crime. Some cases may have been registered several times by the police, such as when there was more than one victim, whereas the prosecution would registered such cases only once.
Intro for the official data graphs

The numbers below represent all incidents recorded by the police and sent to the criminal prosecutor's office.

Bias motivations and crime types
Mandated bias motivation
Crime types figures
Cases Recorded by Police
1143
Mandated bias motivation
Crime types figures
Cases Recorded by Police
68
Mandated bias motivation
Crime types figures
Cases Recorded by Police
163
Mandated bias motivation
Crime types figures
Cases Recorded by Police
12
Crime types figures
Cases Recorded by Police
182
NPC
Bias motivation
Description Type
Reports
Organization Report

This number refers only to bias on the grounds of sexual orientation. Crimes motivated by bias against gender identity are not monitored.

Description Type
Reports
Organization Report

This category refers to all other discriminatory cases not listed elsewhere.

Description Type
Developments
Organization Report

In 2019, the Police of Antwerp provided specialized support and reception of victims of hate crime. The Police of Charleroi drafted an information leaflet for victims of hate crime, with information on obtaining support from Belgium's equality bodies (Unia and the Institute of equality between women and men). This initiative has been followed by other local police units. Furthermore, the Police of La Louvière developed a brochure for local police officers explaining how to handle hate crime cases. In 2018 and 2019, several local police unites developed a model "procès verbal" (a written record of an official proceeding), in order to register hate incidents in the correct manner. A group was also set up via Yammer (a corporate social network) where contact police officers listed in the Circular on the investigation and prosecution policy on discrimination and hate crimes (COL13/2013) can network and share information online. The Federal Police created a SharePoint page where relevant knowledge and information about COL13/2013 will be made available for police officers.

Following recommendations made by the EU FRA and ODIHR at a January 2020 workshop on registering hate crimes and offences, a working group composed of representatives of the Equal Opportunities Team (SPF Justice), the police, the judiciary and Unia was set up to optimize the registration of hate crimes. The aim of this working group is to provide solutions to the various problems regarding hate crime registration in Belgium, including: the absence of an obligation to systematically register all hate crimes at the police level; the technical impossibility of registering cases of multiple discrimination (hate crimes on the basis of several protected criteria); and the lack of a system to automatically transmit information about hate crimes registered by police to the IT systems of the judiciary and the Central Criminal Records Office.

IGO
Description Type
Developments
Organization Report

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) published relevant recommendations in its "Sixth report on Belgium."

Bias Motivation
Description Type
Developments
Organization Report

The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) published relevant recommendations in its 2019 Roma and Travellers Survey findings, "Roma and Travellers in six countries."

ODIHR Recommendations

ODIHR observes that Belgium has not reported on cases of hate crimes separately from cases of hate speech or discrimination.

Overall incidents summary

Antisemitisme.be reported descriptive incidents as well as statistical data. Kantor Center reported only statistical data. This explains the discrepancy between the graphic above and the incidents included below.